当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

论不动产冒名处分的善意取得

发布时间:2019-01-09 18:04
【摘要】:自我国《物权法》(第106条、第107条)规定善意取得制度以来,在审判实践中相关案例不断出现,由于《物权法》对善意取得制度的规定过于宽泛,法律条文还不够完善,审判实践中裁判者对此不免有很多困惑。本文通过两起冒名处分不动产所有权及抵押权案件引出冒名处分不动产所有权及其他物权能否适用不动产善意取得规则问题,重点对冒名处分情形下是否适用善意取得制度以及冒名处分是否符合不动产善意取得规则的适用要件进行分析。本文共分为五个部分。第一部分,通过两个案例引出本文探讨的问题,即冒名处分不动产情形下可否适用善意取得规则。第二部分,本文对理论界关于冒名处分是否适用善意取得规则的正反两方面的观点作了介绍,并分析了支持各方观点的理论依据。第三部分,本文从权利外观和风险控制的角度论证冒名处分可以使用善意取得规则,然后对冒名处分是否符合不动产善意取得的适用要件进行了论述,其中对“冒名处分”是否属于“无权处分”的范畴;善意的判断标准及判断时点;“合理价格”的判断标准及其在实践中的应用进行了重点阐述。通过对不动产善意取得构成要件的分析,本文中引用的两起“冒名处分”案符合不动产善意取得规则的构成要件。第四部分,本文对冒名处分是否适用表见代理规则、夫妻共同共有财产处分权与善意取得规则的区别、冒名处分不动产善意取得情形下不动产登记部门的责任等几个与”冒名处分”不动产相关的几个法律问题进行了论述。最后对本文探讨的问题进行简要的回顾和总结。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of bona fide acquisition system in China's property Law (Article 106, Article 107), there have been many cases in the trial practice. Due to the extensive provisions of the bona fide acquisition system in the Real right Law, the legal provisions are not perfect enough. In trial practice, there is much confusion among the judges. In this paper, through two cases of disposal of immovable property ownership and hypothec, the question of whether the immovable property ownership and other real rights can be applied to the rules of acquisition of immovable property in good faith is raised. This paper focuses on the analysis of whether bona fide acquisition system is applicable in the case of false disposition and whether the pseudonym disposition conforms to the applicable elements of the rules of bona fide acquisition of immovable property. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part, through two cases, leads to the question of whether the rule of bona fide acquisition can be applied in the case of false disposition of immovable property. In the second part, this paper introduces the theory of whether the pseudonym is applicable to the rules of acquisition in good faith, and analyzes the theoretical basis of supporting the views of the parties. In the third part, from the angle of right appearance and risk control, this paper demonstrates that the pseudonym disposition can use the rule of bona fide acquisition, and then discusses whether the pseudonym disposition accords with the applicable elements of bona fide acquisition of immovable property. Whether "false punishment" belongs to the category of "unauthorized disposition"; The standard of good faith and its time point, the criterion of "reasonable price" and its application in practice are expounded emphatically. Through the analysis of the constitutive elements of bona fide acquisition of immovable property, the two cases of "false disposition" cited in this paper accord with the constitutive requirements of the rule of bona fide acquisition of immovable property. In the fourth part, the author makes a distinction between the rule of agency, the right of disposition of joint property and the rule of acquisition in good faith. This paper discusses several legal problems related to the disposal of immovable property under the circumstance of bona fide acquisition of immovable property, such as the responsibility of the registration department of immovable property. At last, the problems discussed in this paper are reviewed and summarized briefly.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 熊丙万;;论赃物的善意取得及其回复请求权[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2008年02期

2 傅鼎生;;不动产善意取得应排除冒名处分之适用[J];法学;2011年12期

3 李建伟;不动产善意取得制度初探[J];中央政法管理干部学院学报;2000年03期

4 朱广新;;不动产适用善意取得制度的限度[J];法学研究;2009年04期



本文编号:2405918


论文下载
论文发表
教材专著
专利申请


    下载步骤:
    1.微信扫码,备注编号 2405918.
    2.
    点击下载


    本文链接:http://www.bigengculture.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2405918.html

    ×
    论文发表,推荐期刊