热门搜索: 论文 发表 社科期刊 北大核心 南大核心 cssci 科技期刊 教育

当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 书法论文 >

书法“工”“拙”与道德的遇见——从苏轼评述“君子”“小人”“工”“拙”与书法的关系来看

发布时间:2018-09-14 20:51  文章来源:笔耕文化传播
【摘要】:对于书法与道德,书法的"工"与"拙",从古至今都未曾停止过讨论。在苏轼的书法理念中,也明确提出"书有工拙,而君子小人之心不可乱也"之论。认为书有工拙之分,并以为工拙之分不是书法评介的目的,君子与小人之字不在于工拙与否,且明确提出君子与小人之字是不可等同视之的。在今天这个书法盛行的时代,也多是以"工""拙"作为书法的批评标准。但这似乎违背了古人认识书法的习惯,为此本文以苏轼为例探析古人的书法道德观及与"工""拙"的关系。
[Abstract]:For calligraphy and morality, calligraphy's "workmanship" and "clumsiness" have not stopped discussion since ancient times. In Su Shi's calligraphy idea, he also put forward the theory that "the book has works and is clumsy, but the mind of the gentleman and the villain should not be confused." The author thinks that the book has the distinction of workmanship and clumsiness, and taking it as the classification of workmanship is not the purpose of calligraphy evaluation, the character of gentleman and villain does not lie in whether the work is clumsy or not, and it is clearly pointed out that the character of gentleman and villain cannot be regarded as equivalent. In today's calligraphy era, most of the calligraphy is based on "Gong" and "clumsy" as the standard of calligraphy criticism. But this seems to violate the ancients' habit of understanding calligraphy. Therefore, this paper takes Su Shi as an example to explore the relationship between the ancient calligraphy morality and the "clumsy" of "Gong".
【作者单位】: 云南大学;
【分类号】:J292.1


本文编号:2243834


论文下载
论文发表
教材专著
专利申请


    下载步骤:1.微信扫码 2.备注编号 2243834. 3.下载文档

    注:1.必须备注编号,否则无法下载;2.扫码后10分钟即可下载,如有问题,点击微信联系客服。

    扩展阅读
    1. 书法“工”“拙”与道德的遇见——从苏轼评述“君子..._吾喜杂志网
    2. 苏轼“书品即人品”的书学思想
    3. 颜真卿对苏轼书法的影响
    4. 苏轼句书法备于正书,溢而为行草,未能正书而能行草,无足道也、、、...
    5. 书法格言大全 | 格言精英家教网
    6. 浅析苏轼早期书法风格_图文_百度文库
    7. [转载]苏东坡书法有特点_青青子衿_新浪博客


    本文连接:http://www.bigengculture.com/wenyilunwen/shufayishu/2243834.html

    上一篇:草书柳宗元谪龙说卷  
    下一篇:没有了